- Home
- Market Rules
- Issues
NOGRR177
Summary
Title | Related to NPRR857, Creation of Direct Current Tie Operator Market Participant Role |
---|---|
Next Group | |
Next Step | |
Status | Approved on 10/09/2018 |
Action
Date | Gov Body | Action Taken | Next Steps |
---|---|---|---|
10/09/2018 | BOARD | Approved | |
09/26/2018 | TAC | Recommended for Approval | Revision Request Consideration |
07/26/2018 | TAC | Deferred/Tabled | Revision Request Consideration |
06/07/2018 | ROS | Recommended for Approval | Revision Request Consideration |
05/03/2018 | ROS | Recommended for Approval | Impact Analysis Consideration |
04/05/2018 | ROS | Deferred/Tabled | Language Consideration |
Voting Record
Date | Gov Body | Motion | Result |
---|---|---|---|
10/09/2018 | BOARD | approved NOGRR177 as recommended by TAC in the 9/26/18 TAC Report | Passed |
09/26/2018 | TAC | to recommend approval of NOGRR177 as recommended by ROS in the 6/7/18 ROS Report | Passed |
07/26/2018 | TAC | to table NOGRR177 | Passed |
06/07/2018 | ROS | To endorse and forward to TAC the 5/3/18 ROS Report and Impact Analysis for NOGRR177. | Passed |
05/03/2018 | ROS | To recommend approval of NOGRR177 as submitted. | Passed |
04/05/2018 | ROS | To table NOGRR177 and refer the issue to the Operations Working Group (OWG). | Passed |
Background
Status: | Approved |
---|---|
Date Posted: | Mar 19, 2018 |
Sponsor: | ERCOT |
Urgent: | No |
Sections: | 1.4, 1.5.3, 2.1, 2.7.3.3, 2.8, 2.8.1, 3.1.1, 3.1.3, 3.2.3, 3.6, 3.7, 3.7.2, 4.2.1, 4.2.2, 4.2.3, 4.2.4, 4.5.2, 4.5.3, 4.5.3.2, 4.6.4, 5.1, 6.1.3.2, 6.2.6.2.6, 7.1, 7.1.2, 7.2.2, 7.3, 7.3.2, 7.3.3, 7.3.5, 9.1, 9.2, 9.2.2, 10.1 |
Description: | This Nodal Operating Guide Revision Request (NOGRR) revises the Nodal Operating Guide (NOG) to be consistent with NPRR857 language relating to Directive 1 of Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) Docket No. 46304-3, Oversight Proceeding Regarding ERCOT Matters arising out of Docket No. 45624 (Application of the City of Garland to Amend A Certificate of Convenience and Necessity for the Rusk to Panola Double-Circuit 345-KV Transmission Line in Rusk and Panola Counties). |
Reason: | Regulatory requirements |