Title: Synchronization with NPRR454, Removal of Unfunded Project List Language, and Modification of Administrative PGRR Definition
    Next Group:
    Next Step:
    Status: Approved on 12/11/2012
    Effective Date: 01/01/2013


    Date Gov Body Action Taken Next Steps
    12/11/2012 Board of Directors Approved
    11/29/2012 TAC Recommended for Approval Board Consideration
    11/08/2012 ROS Recommended for Approval TAC Consideration
    09/25/2012 PLWG Recommended for Approval ROS Consideration
    08/30/2012 PLWG Recommended for Approval PLWG IA Review

    Voting Record

    Date Gov Body Motion Result
    12/11/2012 Board of Directors To approve PGRR021 as recommended by TAC in the 11/29/12 TAC Report Passed
    11/29/2012 TAC To recommend approval of PGRR021 as amended by the 10/2/12 ERCOT comments. All Market Segments were present for the vote Passed
    11/08/2012 ROS To recommend approval of PGRR021 as amended by the 10/2/12 ERCOT comments Passed
    09/25/2012 PLWG Consensus to endorse and forward the 8/30/12 PLWG Report and Impact Analysis for PGRR021 to ROS Passed
    08/30/2012 PLWG Consensus to recommend approval of PGRR021 as submitted

    Vote tallies here reflect individual votes, not the weight of the votes by market segment. Affirmative votes are not recorded in these vote tallies. For additional details on the voting record, please consult the Recommendation or Action Report, or the official vote tally if available, as posted in the key documents.


    Status: Approved
    Date Posted: 08/14/2012
    Sponsor: ERCOT
    Urgent: No
    Sections: 1.2.1,,,,,
    Description: This Planning Guide Revision Request (PGRR) aligns the Planning Guide with Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) 454 (approved by the ERCOT Board on July 17, 2012), which removed language regarding the Unfunded Project List; aligns the Planning Guide with the Protocols by requiring ERCOT’s opinion in the TAC Report; modifies the scope of the Administrative PGRR definition to include revisions for the purpose of maintaining consistency between Section 1.2.1 and Protocol Section 21, Revision Request Process; and includes administrative alignment changes.
    Reason: Alignment with the Protocols by removing language regarding the Unfunded Project List; including ERCOT’s opinion in TAC Reports; and allowing PGRRs that are for the purpose of alignment with Protocol Section 21 to proceed as Administrative PGRRs, significantly decreasing the amount of work and meeting time that must be devoted to these routine PGRRs.

    Key Documents