- Home
- Market Rules
- Issues
NOGRR036
Summary
Title | Synchronization with PRR821 and PRR804 |
---|---|
Next Group | |
Next Step | |
Status | Approved on 07/01/2010 |
Effective Dates |
12/01/2010
or per the Nodal Protocol Transition Plan http://www.ercot.com/mktrules/protocols (08/01/10 Nodal Operating Guide Library) |
Action
Date | Gov Body | Action Taken | Next Steps |
---|---|---|---|
07/01/2010 | TAC | Approved | |
06/10/2010 | ROS | Recommended for Approval | TAC Consideration |
05/19/2010 | OWG | Recommended for Approval | ROS Consideration |
04/21/2010 | OWG | Recommended for Approval | OWG IA Review |
Voting Record
Date | Gov Body | Motion | Result |
---|---|---|---|
07/01/2010 | TAC | To approve NOGRR036 as recommended by ROS in the 6/10/10 ROS Recommendation Report | Passed |
06/10/2010 | ROS | To recommend approval of NOGRR036 as recommended by OWG in the 5/19/10 OWG Recommendation Report | Passed |
05/19/2010 | OWG | Consensus to endorse and forward the 4/21/10 OWG Recommendation Report and Impact Analysis for NOGRR036 to ROS | |
04/21/2010 | OWG | Consensus to recommend approval of NOGRR036 as revised by the 4/12/10 NOGRRTF comments |
Background
Status: | Approved |
---|---|
Date Posted: | Mar 19, 2010 |
Sponsor: | ERCOT |
Urgent: | No |
Sections: | 1.3 |
Description: | This Nodal Operating Guide Revision Request (NOGRR) synchronizes the Nodal Operating Guides with PRR821, Update of Section 21, Process for Protocol Revision, and PRR804, Revisions to Section 21 Appeal Process. Specifically, this NOGRR revises Section 1.3 to more effectively align with the current stakeholder process and to provide that if a motion to approve a request fails, the revision request shall be deemed rejected by the body considering it and subject to appeal, unless at the same meeting that body later votes to recommend approval, remand, or refer the revision request. Changes were made to bring consistency between the NOGRR process, where applicable; remove arbitrary or conflicting timelines; clarify commenting process; expand on a revision request being deemed rejected to include email voting for the Reliability and Operations Subcommittee (ROS) and Technical Advisory Committee (TAC); and include formatting and administrative changes. |
Reason: | A clearly defined revision process for transparency and further definition regarding what an appealable event is and clarity to the NOGRR process. |
Key Documents
Mar 19, 2010 - doc - 143.5 KB
Mar 19, 2010 - doc - 66 KB
Mar 19, 2010 - doc - 45 KB
Apr 12, 2010 - doc - 114.5 KB
Apr 26, 2010 - doc - 119.5 KB
May 20, 2010 - doc - 120 KB
Jun 14, 2010 - doc - 121.5 KB
Jul 6, 2010 - doc - 123.5 KB