Issues

NOGRR038

Title	Synchronization with OGRR243, Disturbance Monitoring Requirements Clarification
Next Group
Next Step
Status	Approved on 08/05/2010
Effective Dates	12/01/2010 or per the Nodal Protocol Transition Plan http://www.ercot.com/mktrules/protocols (09/01/10 Nodal Operating Guide Library)

Date	Gov Body	Action Taken	Next Steps
08/05/2010	TAC	Approved
07/15/2010	ROS	Recommended for Approval	TAC Consideration
06/16/2010	OWG	Recommended for Approval	ROS Consideration
05/19/2010	OWG	Recommended for Approval	OWG IA Review

Date

Gov Body

Action Taken

Next Steps

08/05/2010

TAC

Approved

07/15/2010

ROS

Recommended for Approval

TAC Consideration

06/16/2010

OWG

Recommended for Approval

ROS Consideration

05/19/2010

OWG

Recommended for Approval

OWG IA Review

Date	Gov Body	Motion	Result
08/05/2010	TAC	To approve NOGRR038 as recommended by ROS in the 7/15/10 ROS Recommendation Report	Passed
07/15/2010	ROS	Co recommend approval of NOGRR038 as recommended by OWG in the 6/16/10 OWG Recommendation Report and as revised by the 7/6/10 ERCOT comments	Passed
06/16/2010	OWG	Consensus to forward the 5/19/10 OWG Recommendation Report as revised by OWG and the Impact Analysis for NOGRR038 to ROS
05/19/2010	OWG	Consensus to recommend approval of NOGRR028 as revised by OWG

Date

Gov Body

Motion

Result

08/05/2010

To approve NOGRR038 as recommended by ROS in the 7/15/10 ROS Recommendation Report

Passed

07/15/2010

Co recommend approval of NOGRR038 as recommended by OWG in the 6/16/10 OWG Recommendation Report and as revised by the 7/6/10 ERCOT comments

Passed

06/16/2010

Consensus to forward the 5/19/10 OWG Recommendation Report as revised by OWG and the Impact Analysis for NOGRR038 to ROS

05/19/2010

Consensus to recommend approval of NOGRR028 as revised by OWG

Status:	Approved
Date Posted:	Mar 26, 2010
Sponsor:	SPWG
Urgent:	No
Sections:	6.1.2.3, 6.1.2.4
Description:	This Nodal Operating Guide Revision Request (NOGRR) synchronizes the Nodal Operating Guides with OGRR243 by changing data recording and reporting requirements for equipment operating at 100kV or above at Facilities where fault recording equipment is required.
Reason:	The System Protection Working Group (SPWG) prefers that the fault data recording requirements allow for calculated electrical quantities which are used in modern protection system equipment and can be determined by modern fault analysis software. The SPWG also prefers that recording requirements for autotransformers should allow for monitoring of either high voltage or low voltage terminals and that specification in the fault reporting template of the recorded time standard (such as Central Standard Time (CST) or Coordinated Universal Time (UTC)), replace the requirement of CST recording requirements.