- Home
- Market Rules
- Issues
NOGRR109
Summary
| Title | Revisions to Definition of Credible Single Contingency for Operations Planning |
|---|---|
| Next Group | |
| Next Step | |
| Status | Approved on 01/28/2014 |
| Effective Dates |
02/01/2014
|
Action
| Date | Gov Body | Action Taken | Next Steps |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/28/2014 | TAC | Approved | |
| 10/03/2013 | TAC | Deferred/Tabled | TAC for consideration |
| 09/12/2013 | ROS | Recommended for Approval | TAC Consideration |
| 07/11/2013 | ROS | Deferred/Tabled | ROS Consideration |
| 06/19/2013 | OWG | Recommended for Approval | ROS Consideration |
| 06/13/2013 | ROS | Remanded | OWG Consideration |
| 04/17/2013 | OWG | Recommended for Approval | ROS Consideration |
| 03/20/2013 | OWG | Recommended for Approval | OWG IA Review |
Voting Record
| Date | Gov Body | Motion | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/28/2014 | TAC | To approve NOGRR109 as recommended by ROS in the 9/12/13 ROS Report. | Passed |
| 10/03/2013 | TAC | To table NOGRR109 until associated Constraint Management Plan NPRRs are approved. | Passed |
| 09/12/2013 | ROS | To recommend approval of NOGRR109 as recommended by OWG in the 6/19/13 OWG Report | Passed |
| 07/11/2013 | ROS | To table NOGRR109 | Passed |
| 06/19/2013 | OWG | To recommend approval of NOGRR109 as amended by the 6/14/13 CenterPoint Energy comments and as revised by OWG. | |
| 06/13/2013 | ROS | To remand NOGRR109 to OWG for one month | Passed |
| 04/17/2013 | OWG | Consensus to endorse and forward the 3/20/13 OWG Report and Impact Analysis for NOGRR109 to ROS | |
| 03/20/2013 | OWG | Consensus to recommend approval of NOGRR109 as revised by OWG |
Background
| Status: | Approved |
|---|---|
| Date Posted: | Mar 5, 2013 |
| Sponsor: | Operations Working Group (OWG) |
| Urgent: | No |
| Sections: | 1.4 |
| Description: | This Nodal Operating Guide Revision Request (NOGRR) deletes the definition of Credible Single Contingency from the Operating Guides. |
| Reason: | The original intent of this NOGRR was to respond to the 2/14/13 ROS directive to the Operations Working Group (OWG) and based on the recommendation of the Operations and Planning Synchronization Task Force (OPSTF) regarding Issue 6 of the OPSTF Issues List Matrix, which relates to the "[u]se of double circuit contingencies to develop operating limits." The OPSTF recommendation is as follows: "OPSTF discussed a proposal that a DCKT outage be considered only if it caused a reliability problem. The 'push-back' was that it is hard for the market to model contingencies that are sometimes run and sometimes not. ERCOT commented that this would be complex, burdensome and require new tools for System Operations. OPSTF recommends that ROS direct OWG to modify the Operating Guides language (pg. 1-15) to better reflect the actual practice." After further review, the OWG has agreed to delete the definition of Credit Single Contingency from the Nodal Operating Guides. The definition will be incorporated in the Protocols as the use of the term is being introduced in Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) 540, Clarification of Credible Single Contingency. |
Key Documents
Mar 5, 2013 - doc - 58 KB
Mar 25, 2013 - doc - 66.5 KB
Apr 8, 2013 - doc - 54.5 KB
Jun 17, 2013 - doc - 67 KB
Jun 17, 2013 - doc - 69 KB
Jun 14, 2013 - doc - 52 KB
Jun 21, 2013 - doc - 70.5 KB
Jul 15, 2013 - doc - 70.5 KB
Sep 16, 2013 - doc - 71 KB
Oct 4, 2013 - doc - 72.5 KB
Jan 30, 2014 - doc - 73 KB