- Home
- Market Rules
- Issues
NPRR224
Summary
| Title | Remove Dynamic Rating Requirements for Annual Planning Models |
|---|---|
| Next Group | |
| Next Step | |
| Status | Approved on 07/20/2010 |
| Effective Dates |
12/01/2010
or per the Nodal Protocol Transition Plan http://www.ercot.com/mktrules/protocols (08/01/10 Nodal Protocols Library) |
Action
| Date | Gov Body | Action Taken | Next Steps |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/17/2010 | PRS | Recommended for Approval | TAC Consideration |
| 05/20/2010 | PRS | Recommended for Approval | PRS IA Review |
| 04/22/2010 | PRS | Referred | ROS Review |
| 07/01/2010 | TAC | Recommended for Approval | ERCOT Board Review |
| 07/20/2010 | BOARD | Approved |
Voting Record
| Date | Gov Body | Motion | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/17/2010 | PRS | To endorse and forward the 5/20/10 PRS Report and Impact Analysis for NPRR224 to TAC | Passed |
| 05/20/2010 | PRS | To recommend approval of NPRR224 as submitted | Passed |
| 04/22/2010 | PRS | To refer NPRR224 to ROS | Passed |
| 07/01/2010 | TAC | To recommend approval of NPRR224 as recommended by PRS in the 6/17/10 PRS Report as revised by TAC | Passed |
| 07/20/2010 | BOARD | To approve NPRR224 as recommended by TAC in 7/1/10 TAC Report |
Background
| Status: | Approved |
|---|---|
| Date Posted: | Apr 8, 2010 |
| Sponsor: | Steady State Working Group |
| Urgent: | No |
| Sections: | 3.10.8, 3.10.8.4 |
| Description: | This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) removes the use of Dynamic Rating for Annual Planning Models. |
| Reason: | Annual Planning Models currently only use static ratings. The Texas Nodal Transition Plan Task Force (TPTF) agreed at their January 2006 meeting ‘to the continuation of current practices regarding the use of Summer static ratings for any summer Annual Planning Case." Furthermore, the Steady State Working Group (SSWG) recommends that all Annual Planning Cases, Summer or not, use the static ratings as this is inherently conservative and simplifies the case building process. Therefore, it is recommended that the Protocol language reflect the process agreed to by the SSWG. |
Key Documents
Apr 9, 2010 - doc - 81 KB
Apr 9, 2010 - doc - 65.5 KB
Apr 20, 2010 - doc - 47.5 KB
Apr 21, 2010 - doc - 41 KB
Apr 27, 2010 - doc - 86 KB
Apr 30, 2010 - doc - 42 KB
May 18, 2010 - doc - 38 KB
May 25, 2010 - doc - 89 KB
Jun 9, 2010 - doc - 44 KB
Jun 21, 2010 - doc - 90 KB
Jul 6, 2010 - doc - 93 KB
Jul 22, 2010 - doc - 93.5 KB