- Home
- Market Rules
- Issues
OGRR232
Summary
| Title | Revise the Process for Submitting Biennial Unit Reactive Limits (Lead and Lag) |
|---|---|
| Next Group | |
| Next Step | |
| Status | Approved on 04/08/2010 |
Action
| Date | Gov Body | Action Taken | Next Steps |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/08/2010 | TAC | Approved | |
| 03/11/2010 | ROS | Recommended for Approval | TAC for consideration. |
| 02/19/2010 | OWG | Recommended for Approval | ROS Consideration |
| 01/18/2010 | OWG | Recommended for Approval | OWG IA Review |
| 12/16/2009 | OWG | Deferred/Tabled | OWG Review |
| 11/17/2009 | OWG | Deferred/Tabled | OWG Review |
| 10/21/2009 | OWG | Deferred/Tabled | OWG Review |
| 08/19/2009 | OWG | Recommended for Approval | OWG Impact Analysis Review |
Voting Record
| Date | Gov Body | Motion | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/08/2010 | TAC | To approve OGRR232 as recommended by ROS in the 3/11/10 ROS Recommendation Report | Passed |
| 03/11/2010 | ROS | To recommend approval of OGRR232 as amended by the 2/24/10 ERCOT comments. | Passed |
| 02/19/2010 | OWG | Consensus to endorse and forward the 1/18/10 OWG Recommendation Report and revised Impact Analysis for OGRR232 to ROS | |
| 01/18/2010 | OWG | Consensus to recommend approval of OGRR232 as revised by the 1/5/10 CenterPoint comments | |
| 12/16/2009 | OWG | Consensus to table OGRR232 for one month. | |
| 11/17/2009 | OWG | Consensus to table OGRR232 for one month. | |
| 10/21/2009 | OWG | Consensus to table OGRR232 for one month | |
| 08/19/2009 | OWG | Consensus to recommend approval of OGRR232 as amended by the 8/17/09 Luminant comments and as revised by OWG |
Background
| Status: | Approved |
|---|---|
| Date Posted: | Jul 9, 2009 |
| Sponsor: | LCRA |
| Urgent: | No |
| Sections: | 3.1.4.3.1, 3.1.4.3.2, 3.1.4.3.3, 6.2.3 |
| Description: | This Operating Guide Revision Request (OGRR) deletes Section 6.2.3. The form within that Section is no longer used as results are submitted through the MIS. This OGRR also updates other sections to align with the current process. |
| Reason: | Market Participants will be less confused if they use the proposed process of submitting biennial unit reactive limit tests using the MIS vs. using an outdated form. This change allows the Power Generation Company (PGC) to accomplish the biennial reactive limit test without transmission constraints. |
Key Documents
Jul 9, 2009 - doc - 115 KB
Jul 22, 2009 - doc - 147 KB
Aug 17, 2009 - doc - 80.5 KB
Aug 25, 2009 - doc - 114 KB
Sep 8, 2009 - doc - 43.5 KB
Sep 17, 2009 - doc - 114.5 KB
Oct 14, 2009 - doc - 82.5 KB
Oct 23, 2009 - doc - 117.5 KB
Nov 19, 2009 - doc - 117.5 KB
Dec 11, 2009 - doc - 83 KB
Dec 19, 2009 - doc - 118.5 KB
Dec 23, 2009 - doc - 82.5 KB
Jan 5, 2010 - doc - 77.5 KB
Jan 20, 2010 - doc - 125 KB
Feb 5, 2010 - doc - 43.5 KB
Feb 22, 2010 - doc - 125.5 KB
Feb 24, 2010 - doc - 91.5 KB
Mar 15, 2010 - doc - 130.5 KB
Apr 12, 2010 - doc - 133 KB