- Home
- Market Rules
- Issues
PGRR021
Summary
| Title | Synchronization with NPRR454, Removal of Unfunded Project List Language, and Modification of Administrative PGRR Definition |
|---|---|
| Next Group | |
| Next Step | |
| Status | Approved on 12/11/2012 |
| Effective Dates |
01/01/2013
|
Action
| Date | Gov Body | Action Taken | Next Steps |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/11/2012 | BOARD | Approved | |
| 11/29/2012 | TAC | Recommended for Approval | Board Consideration |
| 11/08/2012 | ROS | Recommended for Approval | TAC Consideration |
| 09/25/2012 | PLWG | Recommended for Approval | ROS Consideration |
| 08/30/2012 | PLWG | Recommended for Approval | PLWG IA Review |
Voting Record
| Date | Gov Body | Motion | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/11/2012 | BOARD | To approve PGRR021 as recommended by TAC in the 11/29/12 TAC Report | Passed |
| 11/29/2012 | TAC | To recommend approval of PGRR021 as amended by the 10/2/12 ERCOT comments. All Market Segments were present for the vote | Passed |
| 11/08/2012 | ROS | To recommend approval of PGRR021 as amended by the 10/2/12 ERCOT comments | Passed |
| 09/25/2012 | PLWG | Consensus to endorse and forward the 8/30/12 PLWG Report and Impact Analysis for PGRR021 to ROS | Passed |
| 08/30/2012 | PLWG | Consensus to recommend approval of PGRR021 as submitted |
Background
| Status: | Approved |
|---|---|
| Date Posted: | Aug 14, 2012 |
| Sponsor: | ERCOT |
| Urgent: | No |
| Sections: | 1.2.1, 1.2.4.5, 1.2.4.8, 1.2.4.10, 1.2.4.11, 1.2.4.12 |
| Description: | This Planning Guide Revision Request (PGRR) aligns the Planning Guide with Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) 454 (approved by the ERCOT Board on July 17, 2012), which removed language regarding the Unfunded Project List; aligns the Planning Guide with the Protocols by requiring ERCOT’s opinion in the TAC Report; modifies the scope of the Administrative PGRR definition to include revisions for the purpose of maintaining consistency between Section 1.2.1 and Protocol Section 21, Revision Request Process; and includes administrative alignment changes. |
| Reason: | Alignment with the Protocols by removing language regarding the Unfunded Project List; including ERCOT’s opinion in TAC Reports; and allowing PGRRs that are for the purpose of alignment with Protocol Section 21 to proceed as Administrative PGRRs, significantly decreasing the amount of work and meeting time that must be devoted to these routine PGRRs. |
Key Documents
Aug 14, 2012 - doc - 71.5 KB
Aug 14, 2012 - doc - 54 KB
Aug 31, 2012 - doc - 78.5 KB
Sep 26, 2012 - doc - 79 KB
Oct 2, 2012 - doc - 67 KB
Nov 12, 2012 - doc - 80.5 KB
Nov 30, 2012 - doc - 83.5 KB
Dec 12, 2012 - doc - 86 KB