- Home
- Market Rules
- Issues
PRR476
Summary
| Title | Ramp Rate Adherence During Local Congestion |
|---|---|
| Next Group | |
| Next Step | |
| Status | Withdrawn |
Action
| Date | Gov Body | Action Taken | Next Steps |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/03/2006 | TAC | Approved | |
| 07/20/2006 | PRS | ||
| 06/21/2006 | WMS | Referred | Consideration of request for withdrawal. |
Voting Record
| Date | Gov Body | Motion | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/03/2006 | TAC | Endorse request for withdrawel of PRR467 | Passed |
| 07/20/2006 | PRS | Voted to recommend granting the request for withdrawal of PRR476. | Passed |
| 06/21/2006 | WMS |
Background
| Status: | Withdrawn |
|---|---|
| Date Posted: | Nov 13, 2003 |
| Sponsor: | Exelon |
| Urgent: | Yes |
| Sections: | 6.7.1.2, 6.10.7 |
| Description: | Currently, the ramp rates on individual resources are ignored during Local Congestion. This leads to Dispatch Instructions that are impossible to adhere to, especially when every unit running for a QSE is getting a unit specific instruction. Although a QSE may ignore category 4 instructions, they must still follow the category 1. In the event that every unit running for a QSE in a zone is getting a category 4, they all make up the category 1. As a result of the ramp rates being violated, SCE cannot be followed, which puts a strain on frequency which leads to regulation and balancing instructions. Further, the QSE can potentially be penalized with imbalance charges for not keeping SCE at 0. |
| Reason: |
Key Documents
Jul 11, 2006 - doc - 36 KB
Jul 25, 2006 - doc - 84.5 KB
Aug 7, 2006 - doc - 86 KB
Sep 2, 2004 - doc - 64 KB
Sep 2, 2004 - doc - 45 KB
Sep 2, 2004 - doc - 45.5 KB
Sep 2, 2004 - doc - 84.5 KB
Sep 2, 2004 - doc - 67.5 KB
Sep 2, 2004 - doc - 86 KB
Sep 2, 2004 - xls - 44 KB