MIS LOG IN

PRR786

Summary

Title Modifications to EILS Settlement
Next Group
Next Step
Status Approved on 03/17/2009

Action

Date Gov Body Action Taken Next Steps
03/17/2009 BOARD Approved
02/05/2009 TAC Recommended for Approval Board consideration
01/22/2009 PRS Recommended for Approval TAC consideration
12/18/2008 PRS Recommended for Approval PRS consider the IA

Voting Record

Date Gov Body Motion Result
03/17/2009 BOARD The ERCOT Board approved PRR786 as recommended by TAC Passed
02/05/2009 TAC To recommend approval of PRR786 as recommended by PRS. Passed
01/22/2009 PRS To endorse and forward the PRS Recommendation Report and Impact Analysis for PRR786 to TAC. Passed
12/18/2008 PRS To recommend approval of PRR786 as amended by the 12/9/08 COPS comments and as revised by PRS. Passed

Background

Status: Approved
Date Posted: Nov 21, 2008
Sponsor: Jim Galvin on behalf of the SDAWG
Urgent: No
Sections: 6.8.6 Capacity Payments for Emergency Interruptible Load Service (EILS), 6.9.4.4 Settlement Obligation for Emergency Interruptible Load Service, 9.5.5, Resettlement of Emergency Interruptible Load Service
Description: This Protocol Revision Request (PRR) revises language to: · Clarify that the first settlement of the Emergency Interruptible Load Service (EILS) Contract Period shall utilize a Qualified Scheduling Entity (QSE) Load Ratio Share (LRS) which is based upon the Final Load for each Operating Day in the EILS Contract Period; · Introduce a resettlement of EILS Contract Period settlement utilizing a QSE LRS which is based upon the True-Up Load for each Operating Day in the EILS Contract Period; · Remove conflicting language about EILS disputes; · Clarify the timing by which EILS settlement disputes must be submitted; and · Move all language related to the timing of the EILS settlement process to Section 9.5.5, Resettlement of Emergency Interruptible Load Service.
Reason: The proposed PRR clarifies the intent of the Protocols and allows for a resettlement of EILS using more accurate Load data, thereby providing a more accurate Uplift of the cost of EILS to each QSE representing Load.

Key Documents

Related Content