Approved by TX SET as a clean-up effort for inclusion in version 3.0
Background
Status:
Closed
Date Posted:
05/18/2006
Sponsor:
TXUE
Urgent:
No
Sections:
867_04
Description:
Clean up of Examples. 867_04 examples (2 of 5) and (3 of 5) are wrong in that they have actual switch dates that conflict for multiple metered ESIIDs. You can not have different dates for meters on a switch.
Reason:
Operational/System Impact: None. Clean up example to reduce confusion in the market when dealing with multiple metered ESIIDs.
Market Impact: The market does not allow for different meter numbers to have conflicting Switch Dates.
Correct examples:
DTM~140~20010731
DTM~140~20010830