Add clarity to determine if the REF~IX is required when the REF~MT is COMBO in the 814_04 transaction.
Next Step:
TDSPs agreed that the language in the 814_04 should be struck to make it consistent with the 814_05. REF~IX is not optional when COMBO. When REF~MT = COMBO the REF~IX is optional when communicating Demand.
TDSPs agreed that the language in the 814_04 should be struck to make it consistent with the 814_05. REF~IX is not optional when COMBO. When REF~MT = COMBO the REF~IX is optional when communicating Demand.
TDSPs will take this back and will bring a response to the meeting in July.
Background
Status:
Closed
Date Posted:
05/26/2011
Sponsor:
ERCOT
Urgent:
No
Sections:
814_04, 814_05, 814_14, 814_22
Description:
Trying to determine if the REF~IX is required when the REF~MT is COMBO. The 814_04 Guide states that it is optional for COMBO, yet the subsequent transactions (that REPs code to) do not say.
Reason:
814 transactions are currently failing in REPs systems due to missing REF~IX for a COMBO meter. Per the 814_05, 814_14, and 814_22 it does not clearly state if the REF~IX is required for COMBO.
